Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners continue MAG funding decision after debate over priorities and BRT costs
Summary
Utah County commissioners continued consideration of the MAG/MPO funding list — including a $1.6 million recommendation for Provo Lakeview Parkway Phase 3 and county‑proposed Elkridge Drive — after commissioners raised concerns about project rankings, MAG technical committee priorities and BRT modeling and costs; the continuation to July 5 passed 3–0.
County commissioners paused action on a regional funding recommendation after a lengthy debate over how projects were prioritized and whether local needs were reflected in MAG/MPO technical rankings.
A staff presenter described two projects with county funding implications: Elkridge Drive (a county‑proposed widening) and Provo Lakeview Parkway Phase 3. Regional planning recommended allocating $1,600,000 in county sales‑tax dollars toward Lakeview Parkway Phase 3. Staff said the MAG technical committee had ranked projects on technical merit before forwarding recommendations to regional planning and then to the county for final approval.
Several commissioners disputed the ranking process and the inclusion of state and transit projects in the county funding list. One commissioner said the technical committee’s model did not reflect local priorities and cited examples where a city‑preferred project received a lower technical rank. Another commissioner voiced frustration with apparent inconsistencies in planning meetings and reserve‑fund conversations, asking why some projects received priority when others seemed to have larger demonstrated traffic needs.
The discussion broadened to the larger BRT program and its related finances. A commissioner questioned the program’s cost estimates and ridership modeling, saying that early projections “supported 12,500 riders first day” but that later adjustments suggested the modeling was “off,” and expressed concern about using county reserves or earmarked dollars to support free‑fare zones or other BRT incentives.
To allow staff and regional partners to address the commissioners’ questions, the commission voted unanimously to continue the MAG/MPO funding item to the Wednesday, July 5 meeting so members could review the ranking methodology, funding sources and any requested changes.
The item will return for further discussion with MAG/MPO staff on the specific prioritization and any recommended adjustments.
