Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Floodplain Overlay topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission adopts floodplain overlay amendments to align with FEMA and engineering practice
Summary
The commission voted 3-0 to adopt text amendments to the county floodplain overlay to allow site-specific, engineer-certified determinations consistent with FEMA/NFIP and building-code standards; commissioners requested the Planning Commission consider broader revisions and flagged insurance concerns raised in other counties.
The Utah County Commission voted 3-0 to adopt proposed text amendments to the county's floodplain overlay (regular agenda item 7), measures staff said are intended to align local rules with FEMA/NFIP guidance and the building code and to allow site-specific engineering determinations.
Robert May of Community Development introduced the proposal and explained it was prompted by an application located in an area of "unknown elevation." Floodplain staff member Bryce Armstrong told commissioners the changes do not alter FEMA-designated floodplain boundaries; rather, they allow an applicant's engineer to determine base flood elevations and finished-floor standards on a project-by-project basis and enable the county engineer to review and verify those determinations.
"Right now, our ordinance specifies here in the flood plain: no matter what elevation you're building, you have to flood proof the entire structure," Armstrong said, explaining the intent is to provide flexibility consistent with federal documents while retaining county ability to be more restrictive where appropriate. Staff also said they had coordinated with the state floodplain coordinator (Kathy Holder) while preparing the changes.
A commissioner urged caution, asking staff to consult counties that experienced insurance problems after FEMA map or local-rule changes. Staff acknowledged those concerns and said the commission's remarks would be forwarded to the Planning Commission as part of a more comprehensive ordinance update.
A motion to adopt the proposed text amendments was moved, seconded and approved 3-0. The commission noted it will pursue a broader review of the floodplain section in coming months and incorporate commissioner feedback to the Planning Commission.
The action is procedural text amendment; staff said the immediate project that prompted the change would not be held up by the amendment and that the Planning Commission may consider additional changes in a later comprehensive review.
