Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves Voorhees Subdivision and an exception to irrigation/fuel‑break requirements

Utah County Commission · May 24, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After staff and fire‑marshal input, commissioners approved the Voorhees Subdivision and an ordinance exception reducing a 100‑foot fuel‑break requirement to allow a 30‑foot irrigated landscaping band; motion carried 3–0.

The Utah County Commission approved the Voorhees Subdivision, including a requested exception to the ordinance's irrigation and wildland fuel‑break requirements.

Brandon Larson, community development staff, explained the applicants sought an exception to the ordinance requirement that generally requires 1.5 acres of irrigation water per acre and a 100‑foot fuel break beyond a 30‑foot irrigated landscaping band. "The applicants are seeking a reduction or ... an exception to the irrigation water requirement," Larson said, adding that the fire marshal had accepted a complete reduction in this case while requiring a 30‑foot irrigated landscaping band and other protections. Staff noted the buildable portion of the lot is constrained (approximately 170 feet deep) and that the proposed configuration has light fuel loads and good access for wildland fire equipment; the parcel is private property (owner name given in staff remarks) rather than Forest Service land.

Commissioners discussed long‑term maintenance and the potential for adjacent private parcels to affect future fire risk, and noted that sprinklers would be required for any home given the urban‑wildland interface designation. After discussion, a commissioner moved to approve the Voorhees Subdivision as stated in regular agenda item 2; the motion carried 3–0.

The approval implements the staff recommendation as presented; staff and the fire marshal’s conditions (irrigated band, sprinklers) were cited as risk‑mitigation measures.

What happens next: subdivision approval proceeds with the conditions discussed; the county retains authority to require compliance with the conditions and building code requirements in the urban‑wildland interface.