Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Taxes Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident concerns over property assessments and South Buckeye closures prompt city response
Summary
A resident questioned a rise in his home assessment and asked how values are calculated; commissioners and the city manager explained assessments come from the county appraiser and urged residents to raise taxing-entity concerns with those bodies. Commissioners also addressed South Buckeye road closure and rail-crossing emergency access concerns.
Get email alerts on the Taxes Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During public comment at the Aug. 27 Coffeyville City Commission meeting, resident Tommy (Tom) Wolfram said his home’s assessed value rose from $49,340 to $52,300 and asked how values are determined. Commissioners and the chair explained that the county appraiser sets assessed market value, not the city, and suggested he contact the county appraiser (named in the meeting as Melody) for details and appeals.
The meeting also featured extended discussion about a long-term closure on South Buckeye and potential emergency-access implications if trains block crossings. City staff said the closure is on a county road and that county, KDOT and emergency services have been coordinating; the closure is expected to last more than 100 working days. Commissioners discussed the high cost and federal involvement generally required to construct an underpass/overpass at rail crossings, but said staff will compile data and pursue meetings with federal and state representatives (including Representative Peck) to explore grant opportunities and prioritization.
Commissioners emphasized the difference between appraisal (a county function) and tax-setting (handled by multiple taxing entities) and noted the city has acted to lower its mill levy. They encouraged residents to attend meetings of other taxing entities if they have concerns about overall tax bills.
The commission recorded no formal action on these public concerns but noted they are catalogued for follow up and that staff will continue coordination with county and state partners on rail-crossing issues.

