Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Contractor Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SFPUC adopts safety prequalification for contractors after audit pressure
Summary
The commission adopted a three-part contractor safety prequalification procedure using OSHA 300A metrics, safety documentation review and expert scoring, with a neutral hearing for firms denied prequalification; the policy aims to raise safety standards across major Chapter 6 construction contracts.
Get email alerts on the Contractor Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Francisco ' The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission voted Nov. 12 to adopt a new contractor safety prequalification procedure intended to raise safety standards on construction projects.
Ivy Fine (Project Administration Bureau) and Deputy City Attorney Randy Parent presented the three-part process developed in consultation with chapter 6 departments, the city risk manager, and construction-industry stakeholders. The initial screening uses data reported on OSHA 300A forms (nonfatal injury/illness rates and lost-work case rates). Contractors that do not meet pass/fail criteria move to a scored evaluation that awards points for injury-rate performance and for documented safety management systems and procedures. A third component considers OSHA citations and the contractor may provide appeal documentation; the procedure allows a neutral hearing officer for disputes and provides due process.
Parent said the approach responds to a Board of Supervisors audit and oversight committee direction after a fatality on another project and aims to ensure the city does not award contracts to bidders with substandard safety performance. Commissioners asked who was consulted during development; staff said they engaged AGC, Yukon and industry safety consultants, chapter 6 departments and the city risk manager, but not labor unions. The commission adopted the procedures by voice vote.
Supporters said the policy raises the safety floor for large projects; some commissioners and public speakers recommended further consultation with union safety representatives and continued refinement of scoring matrices.
