Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County adopts amended subdivision regulations after debate over private-road gates
Summary
The Yellowstone County commissioners approved Resolution 24-119, updating subdivision regulations to reflect 2023 state law changes and to add rules on private roads, firewater standards and parkland dedication; a proposed exemption to the electronic-gate requirement failed.
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Yellowstone County Board of County Commissioners on July 23 approved Resolution 24-119, adopting comprehensive amendments to the county's subdivision regulations intended to align local rules with recent state legislative changes and county practices.
Dave, a county staff presenter, told commissioners the changes incorporate 2023 state law updates, update definitions (including parkland), streamline submittal requirements for an electronic workflow and create clearer processes for minor and expedited subdivision reviews. He said the regulations also formally add policies long used administratively — including traffic-impact-study requirements and standards for community water and septic systems.
The revisions also tighten fire-protection language: county staff proposed eliminating the 10,000-gallon tank threshold and instead requiring a 30,000-gallon tank for fire suppression starting at Lot 4, saying 30,000 gallons is recognized by ISO as an acceptable water source. Dave said the reimbursement language for dry-hydrant and tank maintenance was clarified so payments go to the RSID that maintains the system.
A significant point of contention was a new private-road provision that would require electronic gates (with Knox Boxes for fire access) to make private roads unmistakably distinct from public roads. Steve Simonson of the Billings Association of Realtors said his organization opposed the gating requirement and argued signage should be adequate. An unidentified speaker (speaker 8 in the transcript) called the requirement "big brother" and moved a substitute motion to remove the electronic-gate requirement; that substitute motion failed for lack of a second.
County public-works staff, including Tim (the public works director), defended the changes, saying private roads have repeatedly created maintenance and safety problems and that clear delineation of public versus private roads protects residents and clarifies maintenance responsibility. Commissioners debated costs, homeowner-association effectiveness and whether the rules would discourage development; after discussion the board voted to adopt the amended regulations.
The adopted changes also decline to accept private parkland in-lieu of public park dedication (citing 76 3 6 21 MCA as the governing state language) and set minimum park frontage standards (200 continuous feet per acre with a 60-foot minimum access requirement).
The board passed Resolution 24-119 following the presentation and public hearing. The board record shows discussion but no named roll-call tally was recorded in the transcript.
