Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Contracts Staffing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves $100,000-plus ESI purchase after discussion on in-house versus contractor costs
Summary
The board approved a purchase to ESI related to special-education staffing. Members debated whether the district should hire staff directly (saving roughly $30,000 per position after benefits) rather than contracting with a for-profit vendor that retains part of stipends.
The Fountain Hills Unified School board approved a purchase over $100,000 to ESI after a board-level discussion about the district'7s use of contractors for special-education services.
The board president presented a compensation comparison showing a $75,000 base salary for an in-house employee would translate to about $96,000 when employer taxes, retirement, and benefits are included: "when we pay a $75,000 salary, it's not just $75,000 It's actually an additional $21,000 on top of that," the president said. One board member urged the district to consider raising in-house salaries and cutting use of for-profit vendors, saying their research indicated contractors paid staff in the $60,000–$70,000 range while charging the district $114,000–$120,000 for the service.
Supporters of approving the ESI purchase said the specific employees under contract had contributed substantially to the district and that retaining them was worth the cost. One board member said she would vote yes despite preferring a lower number, because the staff have "put their heart into this district." The motion to approve the purchase carried by voice vote.
What happens next: administration will proceed with the ESI contract purchase; board members asked human resources to prepare salary-comparison information for future meetings and to explore whether stipends and bonuses could be structured differently so more pay accrues directly to individuals.
