Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: SFPUC meeting approvals include minutes, consent calendar, grants and contracting actions
Summary
The SFPUC approved the June 26 minutes, the consent calendar, authorization for wastewater bond issuance, non-potable grant program modifications, contract terminations and select contract awards; most items passed by voice vote with no recorded roll-call tallies in the transcript.
SAN FRANCISCO
At its July 10 meeting the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission approved a number of routine and substantive items by voice vote. Key actions taken included:
- Approval of minutes for June 26, 2018 (Item 3): Motion moved, seconded and carried by voice vote with no public comment.
- Consent calendar (Item 9): The commission approved the consent calendar by a single voice vote; no separate discussion or public comment was recorded.
- Non-potable grant program modification (Item 11): The commission approved changes to the PUC's non-potable grants, adding a lower-tier grant of up to $100,000 for projects that replace at least 450,000 gallons per year and new provisions for brewery process water treatment projects.
- Contract termination and rebid (Item 13): The commission approved termination of the Moccasin Pennstock rehabilitation contract due to storm-related inspection delays and directed staff to rebid; staff explained rebidding was required because the contractor's price-hold period would be exceeded.
- Contract award for inspection/cleaning work (single bidder): Staff recommended awarding a contract to the sole qualified bidder, Pipe and Plant Solutions, below the engineer's estimate; commissioners approved the award.
- Authorization to pursue conditional land exchange framework (Item 15): Commissioners approved staff's motion to proceed with negotiations on a conditional exchange involving 639 Bryant and 2000 Marin, subject to environmental testing and other contingencies (see separate coverage).
Why it matters: The votes advanced multiple operational, programmatic and capital-management items that affect PUC operations, grant support for recycled water projects, capital contracting and future land-management decisions.
Vote details: All recorded actions in the transcript were carried by voice vote; the transcript does not include roll-call tallies for individual commissioners on these items. When formal roll-call votes or detailed tallies are required, staff will provide official minutes and associated documentation.
