Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Student Discipline topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Irvine Unified Board approves expulsion with shortened term and transfer to ACCESS for student in case 04H-2425

Irvine Unified School District Board of Education · April 8, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Irvine Unified School District Board approved staff’s recommendation to expel the student in case 04H-2425, suspending and shortening the expulsion so the student may transfer to ACCESS for the remainder of 2024–25 and may re-enroll in 2025–26 under a behavior contract.

The Irvine Unified School District Board of Education voted to approve staff’s recommendation to expel the student in case 04H-2425 and to suspend and shorten the expulsion so the student may voluntarily transfer to the district’s ACCESS program for the remainder of the 2024–25 school year.

Board members moved and seconded the motion during the meeting. Under the action, the student will be permitted to return and re-enroll in the Irvine Unified School District for the 2025–26 school year contingent on a behavior contract; the district will determine the specific school at that time.

The board’s closed-session report earlier in the evening also noted that trustees discussed a separate student discipline matter and other personnel issues, citing Education Code sections 35146 and 48918(c) and Government Code section 54957. The board similarly approved a mandatory leave of absence pursuant to Education Code section 44940 for a certificated employee (identified in the file as employee #210003158).

The board took the expulsion motion as item 7A; after discussion the presiding officer called for a voice vote and declared the motion carried. No individual roll-call vote on the expulsion was recorded in the public transcript.

The board did not provide additional public details about the incident during the meeting, and the district packet did not include expanded facts on the record in the public segments of the meeting. The action follows the district’s standard process for student discipline involving board consideration of staff recommendations.