Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan Change topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission recommends comp-plan change for Vin Park; neighbors raise density and noise concerns
Summary
The commission voted to recommend Comp 15 31 (Vin Park) to city council, with one abstention; staff and the applicant framed changes as conceptual and subject to a later PUD/site-plan public hearing while neighbors urged denial over density, access and pickleball court noise.
The Planning Commission on Aug. 8 recommended that City Council consider a comprehensive-plan change (Comp 15 31) that would enable a mixed residential PUD for the Vin Park parcels north of Kenosha Street.
Staff said the 10.9-acre site, now zoned A-1 and R-2, was proposed to be changed to Level 3 intensity in the comprehensive plan to allow a mix of housing types and limited commercial live-work townhomes. “Our recommendation is that Comp 15 31 be approved subject to city council approving a PUD that is similar to the conceptual PUD provided and the property being platted,” staff said.
Preston Bartley of Westwood Professional Services, representing the applicant, told the commission the team had met with about 16 families in a recent community meeting and had revised the conceptual layout to address access and neighborhood concerns, including gating secondary access for emergency vehicles, moving mixed uses away from sensitive edges, and coordinating drainage improvements with the city.
Neighbors who spoke at the public hearing urged the commission to deny the comp-plan change over density and compatibility concerns. An emailed comment read into the record by staff, from Galen Pink, said the parcels are “approximately a quarter mile from Kenosha Street” and argued the proposed Level 3 intensity was “not defensible” there and urged the commission to follow the adopted comprehensive-plan guidelines. Several residents said they worried about added traffic on Madison Street, drainage into the detention pond, and noise from proposed pickleball courts.
Staff and the applicant responded that the project team would incorporate fencing, buffering and parking controls into the later PUD and site-plan submittals, and that a license agreement would be needed if the development used city-owned detention amenities. Commissioners also noted the drainage-advisory committee had recommended funds be set aside for a study of the detention facility.
A motion to recommend approval of Comp 15 31 as presented by staff carried on a roll-call vote: Commissioner Mindy Payne — Yes; Commissioner Jonathan Townsend — Yes; Commissioner Kaylee Klimpa — Abstain. The commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the city council; staff said the rezoning and the PUD document will return for a full public hearing if the council approves the comp-plan change.
What happens next: The council is scheduled to consider the comprehensive-plan recommendation on Aug. 20; if the council approves, a subsequent public hearing on rezoning and a final PUD will be scheduled where site-level issues (fencing, parking, hours for amenities) will be resolved.
