Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Creve Coeur Board of Adjustment continues variance request for 602 Rue Du Flor Drive to Aug. 15

Creve Coeur Board of Adjustment · July 18, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Creve Coeur Board of Adjustment continued Application No. 24602 — a request to increase allowable site coverage by 4 percentage points at 602 Rue Du Flor Drive to build a rear deck and spa — to the next BOA meeting on Aug. 15; the board noted it requires four affirmative votes for approval.

The Creve Coeur Board of Adjustment on an unspecified date continued Application No. 24602, a request to increase site coverage by 4 percentage points above the 25% limit at 602 Rue Du Flor Drive so the property owner can construct a rear deck and spa.

Unidentified Speaker 1 moved to postpone consideration of the variance to the board’s next meeting; Unidentified Speaker 2 seconded. After S1 asked, "So in all in favor of the continuance," S2 replied, "Aye." The board rescheduled the application for the August 15 BOA meeting. S1 told the applicant the request "requires 4 positive votes" for acceptance, meaning the item is likely to need near‑unanimous support to pass.

Earlier in the meeting the panel approved the minutes. Unidentified Speaker 2 said, "I abstain since I wasn't here," registering an abstention on those minutes.

Board members discussed whether to proceed or delay because they expected five members but did not have that number present. One participant said, "I think it's a year to reapply," in reference to reapplication rules, though the board did not reach a definitive procedural ruling during the session.

During closing discussion, S2 asked staff member Cara whether there was an update on an ongoing lawsuit; Cara replied, "No." Cara also referenced that the matter was filed in December and named 'Judge Walsh' and the city's municipal attorney in the exchange, but portions of that exchange were unclear in the transcript and could not be fully verified.

There was no final vote on Application No. 24602 at this meeting; the variance will be considered by the BOA at its August 15 meeting.