Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board accepts planning commission recommendation to amend Montgomery Business Center PUD; trustee voices cost concerns

Village of Montgomery Board of Trustees · September 10, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees accepted the Planning & Zoning Commission recommendation to amend the Montgomery Business Center planned unit development to allow phased construction of Nell Road tied to Lot 5 occupancy, with one trustee raising concerns about TIF costs though the motion carried unanimously.

The Village of Montgomery accepted a Planning & Zoning Commission recommendation to amend a special use for the Montgomery Business Center planned unit development (PCC 2024-009), adjusting timing and design requirements for Nell Road.

Staff explained the amendment would allow developers to construct Nell Road across Lot 5 frontage (with binder course in place) and permit occupancy of Lot 5 before the full road extension is complete. The amendment also would relax certain features compared with the original PUD: no required bike path, sidewalk on one side only, locating wetland/floodplain landscaping within stormwater easements rather than conservation easements, and the possibility of a reduced bond if TIF funds are used to build Nell Road.

A petitioner’s representative said the request aims to let Lot 5 occupants obtain occupancy in a shorter window while the complete roadway is finished in a "timely manner." Trustees pushed for a clearer definition of "timely" and for security to be posted for the entire road. Trustee (identified in the transcript as Trustee 4) argued that Lot 3 and Lot 5 could be developed without the Nell Road extension, estimated TIF support could be "a couple million dollars," and said he would vote no citing taxpayer concerns. Despite that statement, roll-call voting later recorded unanimous support; the board accepted the planning commission’s recommendation and staff said an enacting ordinance will return at a future meeting.

The record notes public concerns at the planning hearing about removal of a bike path and other design changes; the petitioner has submitted final engineering and preliminary plats and seeks occupancy for Lot 5 possibly by July (timing dependent on bid and construction schedules). Staff and petitioners committed to posting security bonds for the full road to protect the village.