Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Streets Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Stayton council narrows focus to West Town, directs staff to pursue multi-pronged funding and draft street-fee resolution

Stayton City Council · October 22, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a consultant survey that identified $30 million in deferred street maintenance, Stayton council directed staff to prioritize West Town and Kendall Way, pursue design work for other corridors and prepare a fee-schedule resolution (examples discussed: $10–$12 monthly) alongside grant, urban-renewal and general-fund options.

Stayton — City staff and councilors focused the city’s immediate street-repair work on West Town and Kendall Way and asked staff to bring a written resolution to amend the fee schedule as part of a multi-pronged funding plan.

Consultant inventories reviewed by staff showed roughly 40% of Stayton’s streets in poor or very poor condition and an estimated $30,000,000 in deferred maintenance, according to the staff presentation. City Finance Director James Brand said the city currently budgets about $800,000 for street improvements this fiscal year but that project lists identified by consultants total more than $10,000,000.

"My recommendation is West Town," Julia, a city staff presenter, told the council, citing underlying utility conditions that make West Town a feasible constructible project this year. The staff presentation explained that some candidate streets require substantial water-line upgrades that would push costs beyond the available budget and that design typically runs about 10–15% of construction cost.

The council debated how to fund repairs and weighed several tools: a street-fee increase (staff discussed scenarios including raising the monthly fee to roughly $10–$12), transfers from the general fund (councilors discussed a recurring $300,000 target and smaller gestures tied to franchise-fee shares), urban-renewal financing and pursuit of grants. Staff reported the survey showed strong support for using existing general-fund dollars and grants; grants were the most-supported single option and bonds the least-supported.

Several councilors said citizens expect visible fixes to the worst blocks while staff emphasized preventive spending to keep streets from deteriorating further. Councilor McDonald and others urged a combined approach: "We can't not raise the street fee," one councilor said, urging action on fee adjustments while pursuing grants and other revenue.

Councilors and staff agreed on the next steps: staff will draft a well-worded resolution to amend the fee schedule and return options for how any general-fund or franchise-fee contributions might be set; staff will also move forward with design work for prioritized corridors (West Town and Kendall Way) and begin design for North Third and Hollister as funding allows. Staff said a resolution amending the fee schedule would be an amendment to the fee schedule and can be implemented after appropriate outreach.

The council did not adopt a fee increase at this meeting; instead members provided policy direction for staff to prepare formal budget and ordinance/resolution language for a future council vote.