Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters press San Francisco police commission on OCC capacity, Safe San Francisco ordinance and officer accountability
Summary
Multiple public speakers urged the commission to increase accountability — criticizing OCC capacity, warning a one‑year statute of limitations on a pending complaint and pressing for release of Suspicious Activity Reports and more transparency from the police union and city officials.
At the start of the Feb. 3 meeting speakers during general public comment raised a range of police‑accountability concerns and urged the commission to act.
Jim Salinas, a former police commissioner, said he filed with the Office of Citizen Complaints (OCC) in 2014 and criticized the agency’s investigative resources; he described an abrasive traffic stop and said the OCC lacks capacity to complete certain investigations. Daniel Pais accused longtime Police Officers Association consultant Gary Delaney of misconduct in past events and said the POA protects "dirty cops." Nasreena Baragzi, senior staff attorney with the Asian Law Caucus, asked the commission to revisit the Safe San Francisco Civil Rights Ordinance process and warned, "There’s a 1 year statute of limitation that's coming up a month from now and our understanding is that the officer has still not been interviewed." Reem Soleiman, community advocate at the Asian Law Caucus, urged SFPD to release Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) and flagged racial‑profiling risks if SARs are not publicly reviewed.
Other commenters raised these themes: the need to name officers in complaints, pressure on state legislators to change confidentiality protections for officers, requests for more specific agendas so the public can prepare, and support for continued youth engagement in community forums. Michael Petrellas asked the commission to consider a resolution urging state lawmakers (he named Mark Leno, Phil Ting and David Chu) to strip confidentiality protections for officers. Several speakers connected calls for reform to recent officer‑involved shootings and the DOJ review announced in the meeting.
The commission acknowledged these concerns on record and asked department and OCC staff to follow up, noting some items would be placed on future agendas for fuller consideration.
