Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transit Ir Is topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Raytown aldermen advance first reading of IRIS on‑demand transit contract after extended resident Q&A

Raytown Board of Aldermen · June 18, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Raytown Board of Aldermen held a lengthy public Q&A on June 18 over a proposed 12‑month IRIS contract with the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority; staff and KCATA said in‑city trips would be free under the negotiated terms while cross‑border trips may incur modest fares. Final approval is set for July 2.

The Raytown Board of Aldermen on June 18 advanced a first reading of a proposed 12‑month contract with the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority (KCATA) to bring IRIS on‑demand transit service to the city, following more than an hour of public comment and detailed technical questions from aldermen.

The contract before the board would cover a 12‑month period and is written so trips that both begin and end within Raytown carry no fare under staff negotiations, KCATA representative Bryce Shields told the board: "trips within Raytown are free." Shields, who identified himself as the KCATA Community Engagement Affairs Partner, said cross‑jurisdiction trips into neighboring participating cities would carry modest fares (examples cited in the discussion ranged from $3 to $4 depending on zone and transfer type).

Why it matters: Several Temple Heights residents told aldermen they rely heavily on transit to reach grocery stores, medical appointments and other services, and several speakers urged the board to keep fares affordable and clarify pickup logistics for buildings on jurisdictional borders. Sandra Jones said losing the prior route would "really hurt our community," and other residents described paying high one‑way Uber fares to get home from medical appointments.

What the proposal would do: City staff said the City would pay up to $84,000 in its first year toward operating IRIS in Raytown; part of that amount would come from the current budget and the remainder would need FY2025 budget approval. Staff also noted ATA/IRIS does not execute contracts longer than 12 months, so the agreement on the table is for a single year. KCATA staff described IRIS as a ride‑pool/ride‑share model the agency operates with providers such as ZTrip; vehicles vary and include cars, vans and ADA‑accessible units. Riders can book by phone or app, indicate accessibility needs and be assigned a pickup point typically within a quarter mile.

Board and staff clarifications: Aldermen pressed staff and KCATA on multiple operational points: how addresses that straddle the Raytown/Kansas City border will be handled (pickup location is determined by address and the system can be manually adjusted for high‑demand sites), whether aging or disabled riders can get door‑to‑door service (wheelchair‑accessible vehicles can be requested in the app or by phone), and how transfers to fixed‑route buses work (transfer points are built into the system and can allow a no‑fare transfer under specified conditions).

Public reaction: Several residents who have used IRIS elsewhere described positive experiences with phone assistance and door‑to‑door service; others were concerned about replacement of a fixed Flex route and the need for clear written materials and phone help for seniors.

Next steps and procedural status: Alderman Byers moved to approve the bill on first reading and the motion was seconded; the item is scheduled to return to the board for final consideration on July 2, 2024. No final vote on the contract was recorded on June 18.

Supporting evidence: The ordinance language authorizing the contract and the staff presentation were introduced in the June 18 packet; KCATA staff provided operational and fare clarifications during the public meeting. The item remains subject to second‑reading approval at a future meeting.