Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Harassment Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Raytown updates harassment ordinance to align with state law; council approves unanimously
Summary
After a public comment about online harassment, Raytown aldermen approved an update to the municipal harassment code to conform to state statute. Council suspended rules and voted to adopt the revised ordinance unanimously; city attorney said enforcement questions are ultimately matters for the courts.
The Raytown Board of Aldermen voted unanimously Aug. 13 to update the city’s harassment ordinance to align local language with the state statute.
City Attorney Jennifer Bayard told the council the city’s harassment code had not been revised for about 40 years and the proposed ordinance broadens the definition to reflect modern communications, including electronic messages. Several public commenters, including a resident who said the city’s previous ordinance did not cover social-media or text harassment, prompted council attention to the issue.
Aldermen first voted to suspend the rules so the ordinance could be considered the same night; after questions about how courts would interpret "emotional distress" and how enforcement would interact with other nuisance or disturbing-the-peace ordinances, the council held a recorded final vote that carried unanimously.
Bayard said the determination of whether conduct causes emotional distress is ultimately a judicial question and that other municipal tools (nuisance, disturbing the peace) remain available to police and prosecutors. Aldermen who spoke in favor said updating the code was necessary because online harassment and new technologies were not contemplated by the older language.
The ordinance is adopted to match state statutory definitions as described by the city attorney; the council provided no additional enforcement language at the meeting beyond noting courts adjudicate individual claims.
