Committee backs redirecting 1% severance tax share to highway fund to address road shortfalls

Joint Transportation, Highways & Military Affairs · November 16, 2024

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Bill draft 25LSO0258 would move a statutory 1% severance-tax distribution into the highway fund beginning FY2026; Representative Obermueller presented a fiscal model that would lower permanent fund shares while increasing highway funding; WYDOT and contractors urged the change to address a multi-hundred-million-dollar shortfall and inflation-driven construction costs; committee voted 13-1 to advance.

Representative Obermueller presented bill draft 25LSO0258 to reallocate the statutory 1% severance tax distribution to the highway fund beginning in fiscal year 2026. He showed a fiscal model estimating the proposal would shift the permanent funds' statutory share downward and increase the highway fund to about 17% of total severance distributions in the modeled year.

Why proponents support it: Obermueller and WYDOT officials argued Wyoming—s roads face sustained maintenance and capacity shortfalls exacerbated by construction-cost inflation and flat state-side revenues. WYDOT Director Darren Westby and CFO Dennis Byrne described an annual shortfall north of $400 million covering roads, operations and facilities; both warned federal funding reliance and future federal formula risk make state revenue more important.

Contractors and public testimony: Kelly Little of the Associated General Contractors urged committee sponsorship, citing high construction-cost inflation and public-safety impacts of deteriorating roads; the association presented crash-cost estimates and inflation indices.

Committee vote and context: After technical discussion, the committee voted 13-1 to sponsor the bill draft. Members who opposed raised concerns about permanent-fund priorities and long-term investment strategy. Supporters argued redirecting a modest statutory share now would enable both preservation and targeted growth projects.

What happens next: The bill draft will advance as a committee-sponsored draft and proceed through the legislative process. Implementation details, effects on the permanent funds and long-term fiscal policy will be revisited during budget and committee hearings.