Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves PUD amendment, final plat and inducement for Montgomery Business Center; one trustee objects to TIF spending
Summary
Trustees approved a PUD amendment, final plat for Unit 3 and a TIF inducement for JB Commodities' 65-acre development; the inducement passed 5-1 after one trustee voted no and one trustee raised concern about using about $2 million in TIF funds for a road extension.
The Village of Montgomery board approved a set of related land-use actions advancing the Montgomery Business Center’s Unit 3 development, including a planned-unit-development amendment, the final plat for Unit 3 and a resolution inducing redevelopment that could make certain pre-agreement expenditures eligible for TIF reimbursement.
On the PUD amendment (ordinance 20-93, second reading), the petitioner moved for approval and the board carried the ordinance on a recorded roll-call vote. Director Abt (staff) told trustees the amendment modifies protections and site plan elements tied to the Montgomery Business Center. The final plat for Montgomery Business Center Unit 3 (ordinance 20-94, second reading) creates the remaining buildable lots (Lots 3 and 5) and authorizes the village to accept final engineering plans and record the plat once conditions are met; that measure also passed on a 6-0 roll call.
Staff also presented Resolution 2024-045 to induce redevelopment of roughly 65 acres owned by JB Commodities so the village may later consider certain redevelopment project costs as eligible for reimbursement through the TIF program. The inducement does not set a dollar amount; staff said cost estimates and a formal redevelopment agreement will come later with amounts, time frames and reimbursement details. That inducement passed 5-1; one trustee voted no.
Following the PUD vote, a trustee who supported the project nonetheless objected to the use of roughly $2,000,000 of TIF funds to extend Nell Road, calling such an expenditure "asinine" and suggesting the village should scrutinize roadway-related TIF requests. The comment was recorded in the meeting transcription but was not tied to a motion or amendment. Trustees said the inducement simply starts the negotiation and that any specific TIF dollars and terms will return for board approval.
Next steps: staff will finalize engineering cost estimates and bring a redevelopment agreement with dollar amounts, timelines and terms back to the board for formal approval before any TIF reimbursement occurs.
