Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Revision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fountain Hills board approves midyear budget revision after enrollment dip
Summary
After staff reported a reconciled drop of 56 students that reduced the district's M&O revenue control limit, the Fountain Hills Unified School District board approved a midyear budget revision using carryforward reserves; no midyear FTE cuts were proposed.
The Fountain Hills Unified School District governing board approved a midyear budget revision after staff reported a reconciled enrollment decline that reduced the district's revenue control limit and required a formal revision under state reporting rules.
Tyler, presenting the budget reconciliation, told the board that Arizona Department of Education reviews require districts to reconcile the budget adopted in July with current enrollment and that the district's reconciled numbers show a decrease of 56 students. "On the reconciled numbers, we're showing, 56, student difference," he said, adding that the drop reduces the M&O revenue control limit by roughly $341,000.
Tyler said the district will use carryforward balances to balance the budget midyear and is not recommending any immediate full‑time equivalent (FTE) cuts during the school year. "We're utilizing the carry forward to balance budget, midyear. We don't propose any FTE cuts midyear," Tyler said, noting staffing adjustments for fiscal 2025 will be considered during next year's budget process.
The presentation walked board members through how average daily membership (ADM) affects the K–12 funding formula and the two primary budget categories—M&O and capital. Tyler also reviewed add‑ons in the formula and one‑time state aid from the K–12 budget bill; he said the district estimates roughly $330,000 in one‑time state aid (Prop 123/state supplement) included in the reconciliation. "That equates to, 330,000 for Fountain Hills," Tyler said.
Board members pressed on operational implications and next steps. In response to questions about restructuring spending, Tyler reiterated reliance on reserves and signaled that staffing is the district's primary budget consideration going into FY25: "...we'll look to make some adjustments in terms of staffing. That's your number 1 budget item."
The board voted to approve the budget revision as presented. Board materials and the presentation noted the district must complete a second, statutory budget revision in May tied to the 100‑day ADM true‑up, after which no additional state funding will be available for FY25.
What happens next: staff will incorporate the approved revision into the district's financial reports and continue planning for the FY25 budget cycle; the board also discussed early outreach related to facility decisions and lease renewals that could affect future capital planning.
