Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the It Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah County adopts IT security policy changes; elections staff allowed limited Microsoft Access use for current cycle
Summary
The commission adopted an amendment to Utah County's IT security and acceptable use policy. Elections staffer Aaron reported IT granted a limited exception to use Microsoft Access for ballot reconciliation this election cycle and warned the county may need to revisit IT resourcing to comply with new legislative requirements.
Get email alerts on the It Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah County commissioners on Oct. 2 adopted a resolution amending the county's IT security and acceptable use policy. The resolution tightens controls over personally identifiable information and clarifies IT's role in mass communications.
An elections staff member identified as Aaron addressed the commission on the record, saying recent legislation prompted the county to increase protections for voters' personal information. Aaron said he uses Microsoft Access for ballot reconciliation and that a sudden ban on Access immediately before an election would have caused operational difficulties; he thanked IT staff for granting a limited permission to use Access for the current election cycle. "If they were to stop me from being able to use Access in this election right before we go into the election cycle, it would have created a lot of complexity for me," Aaron said.
Aaron also said the county still needs to finalize how to handle mass email services and that the change may necessitate increased IT programming time or budget. He thanked Patrick Warrow, Tim Taylor and Jeff Gray for working toward a solution and noted that staff had submitted budget requests for additional IT resources.
A motion to adopt the IT security amendment was moved, seconded and carried on the record.
What happens next: The county will implement the amended policy; IT and elections staff said they would continue technical work to migrate or replicate Access‑based processes into supported systems and may seek additional IT programming resources in future budgets.
