Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policy Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glendale Elementary School District board adopts revised electronic-device policy to comply with House Bill 2484
Summary
The Glendale Elementary School District Governing Board on July 24 approved a revised technology-use policy (IJNDB) and accompanying procedures aligned with House Bill 2484, requiring devices be silenced during instruction and outlining progressive discipline including possible confiscation; the board also approved several policy readings and routine items.
Get email alerts on the School Policy Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Glendale Elementary School District Governing Board on July 24 approved revisions to its electronic-device policy, IJNDB, and an accompanying regulation intended to bring district procedures into alignment with House Bill 2484 and to have rules in place before the Aug. 4 start of school.
Board members voted to suspend Policy BGB so the technology-policy revisions could be adopted immediately. The motion to approve IJNDB on first and second readings passed with Miss Wilson, Miss Bartels and President Martinez voting aye.
A district administrator who led the review told the board that a 12-member behavioral health and safety committee of parents, teachers, principals and district administrators met in June and July to examine the district’s existing procedures, review language in House Bill 2484 and consult examples from other districts. "The committee analyzed electronic device procedures from other districts just to kind of see what other districts were doing," the presenter said, describing the committee's work and legal consultation.
The adopted procedures require students to set devices to silent or off during instructional time and outline progressive disciplinary steps. "If a student does misuse their technology or does not follow the guidelines, as a first offense, it will result in a verbal warning followed by a minor infraction noted in Synergy," the presenter said. Subsequent offenses may lead to "progressive disciplinary actions including potential device confiscation, detention, in-school suspension, or temporary loss of device privileges," and confiscated phones will be placed in a secure location at the school site.
The presenter also said the district clarified how parents can contact students and how students can contact parents if the need arises; those contact procedures will appear in the policy and regulation.
Board members who reviewed other policy revisions said the district worked with legal counsel to align language and that the district will notify parents and staff before the policy takes effect. A board member noted preference for the district’s evaluation instrument used in superintendent reviews over an ASBA model during a separate policy discussion.
Votes at a glance
- Motion to adopt agenda: approved (Miss Wilson — aye; Miss Bartels — aye; President Martinez — aye). - Consent agenda: approved (Miss Wilson — aye; Miss Bartels — aye; President Martinez — aye). - Policy manual section C (superintendent evaluation): approved on motion (miss Sagata Jones moved; passed with recorded ayes). - Policy manual section D (fiscal management; permits raffles and bingo for student fundraisers compliant with Arizona law and Auditor General guidance): first reading approved. - Policy JLF (reporting child abuse): first reading approved. - Policy BGB suspended to allow immediate action on IJNDB: motion approved. - IJNDB (use of technology resources) first and second readings approved.
What's next
District staff said procedures will be communicated to parents and staff before school starts. The board also discussed upcoming meeting items for Aug. 14, including an opening-day report, a facility-use fee schedule and the SFB capital plan. The board adjourned after member remarks and reminders about Welcome Back events.
Note: Legal references and statutory context cited in the discussion include House Bill 2484 and general references to Arizona law and Auditor General guidance; the meeting transcript did not provide ordinance or statute numbers beyond the House bill name.

