Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board opens discussion on member compensation; policy review committee to draft options
Summary
The Grand Forks school board discussed potential increases to board-member compensation, with suggestions ranging from modest, near-term raises to delaying changes until the next negotiation cycle; no action was taken and the policy review committee will prepare recommendations.
Board members on Tuesday reopened a previously pulled policy about board-member compensation and provided direction to the policy review committee, but took no formal action.
Doctor Brenner framed the item as a follow-up to an earlier meeting and asked the board for feedback before the policy review committee meets again. Miss Lynn suggested a modest increase, saying, "I think, in my opinion, it would be fair to see, like, a $1,500 or $2,000 increase for board members and then the vice president and president follow suit," and argued that the change would bring the district into alignment with peers.
Other members cautioned that comparisons across districts are not apples-to-apples. Doctor Lund said smaller and larger districts assign different responsibilities and that pay structures vary. Doctor Hodeck urged the board to consider the purpose of any increase and cited national variation in practice; she noted some jurisdictions prohibit board pay while others — she said referencing a large urban district example — provide substantial compensation for full-time service.
Mister Cleven expressed skepticism about whether increasing pay changes who steps forward to serve, saying he "struggles with the value statement." Mister Larson said he favored acting sooner rather than tying the change to the next labor negotiation cycle, arguing that a clearer compensation level might attract candidates for upcoming elections.
Doctor Lund reminded members that whatever the policy review committee develops would return to the full board for further discussion and approval. The board did not vote and directed the policy review committee to consider the comments received at the meeting.
