Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Litigation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City attorney: chancellor has ordered tax-sale process in part for TMG case; other lawsuits pending

Sweetwater Board of Commissioners · July 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City attorney John Cleveland said a chancellor granted in part the city's motion for judgment in the TMG matter and appointed a special master to determine delinquent taxes; two other lawsuits (railroad fatality/street suit and a police-related suit) were reported and are with PEP Partners counsel.

City attorney John Cleveland briefed the board on pending litigation, saying a chancellor "granted in part" the city’s motion for judgment in the TMG tax-sale matter and appointed the clerk and master as special master to determine delinquent-tax amounts. Cleveland told the board he had proposed a stipulation to bypass a special-master hearing but was informed the opponent would not agree, so the city will proceed with the clerk-and-master meeting, a report to the chancellor, and then a chancellor hearing before a sale can occur.

Cleveland described the statutory process and said a taxpayer’s attorney could file interlocutory appeals that would further delay the sale; he said the timeline is uncertain and estimated 5–6 months was possible but not guaranteed.

On finances tied to TMG, Cleveland estimated about $850,000 in delinquent taxes (including interest, penalties and fees) are owed across city and county with the city’s portion at just under $300,000. He also noted the city earns interest on those funds at 18% per annum while the matter is pending.

Cleveland and staff also reported two recently filed lawsuits: one involving a fatality at a railroad crossing, which staff say is likely not the city’s liability because crossing maintenance is the railroad’s responsibility; and a police-related suit alleging the city should not have responded to or arrested parties at a residence. Both matters are being handled by PEP Partners counsel and status updates were promised as counsel develops the matters.

The board asked procedural questions about appeals, jury valuation and timing; Cleveland reiterated there is a multi-step process involving clerk and master, chancellor hearing and possible sale, with potential interlocutory appeals prolonging the timeline.