Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shelton P&Z denies proposal to change interior-lot rules after residents and commissioners cite planning gaps
Summary
The commission voted 6–0 to deny a text amendment (application 25-13) that would have removed a 1.5x interior-lot size requirement and altered frontage and setback rules for interior lots, citing insufficient citywide impact analysis and potential neighborhood character changes.
The Shelton Planning & Zoning Commission denied a proposed revision to interior-lot regulations (application 25-13), rejecting language that would have removed a 1.5-times interior‑lot size multiplier and that sought to treat interior lots the same as the underlying zone.
Attorney Conan/Downey Thomas, representing the applicant, told the commission he had uploaded a 1998 court opinion (BHC Co. v. Shelton) and argued the 1.5x rule has no planning benefit; he presented a parcel-size analysis using GIS to estimate parcels that might qualify under the proposed language. Thomas said the accessway should not count toward lot area and that setbacks could match the underlying zone.
Several commissioners and multiple public commenters said the record lacked a robust, citywide impact assessment. Resident Fred Palmer urged denial, arguing the change would allow developers to 'snatch up' rear lots and alter Shelton's character. Thomas Harbinson recommended using a town planner to analyze impacts on a specific parcel (93 North Street) and others. The commission concluded the proposal needed more comprehensive analysis and voted to deny application 25-13 by roll call (6–0).
