Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Student Discipline topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District presentation shows most students with minimal serious infractions; expulsions trending down

JACKSONVILLE NORTH PULASKI SCHOOL DISTRICT · August 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a Jacksonville North Pulaski School District board meeting, Jacob Smith presented K'12 discipline data showing 3,917 students had 0 or 1 Level 3 infractions last year ("That's 94%"), 252 had two or more, and Level 4 offenses were rare; expulsions have declined, officials said.

Jacob Smith, a district presenter, told the Jacksonville North Pulaski School District board that the district's discipline metrics remain concentrated among a small share of students. "Last year, 3,917 scholars had 0 or 1 level 3 infractions," Smith said. "That's 94%." She said 252 scholars had two or more Level 3 infractions.

Smith framed the trends as partly pandemic-related: some students who disengaged during COVID have returned and struggled, contributing to statewide increases that the district has worked to reduce. She said in-school suspensions have fallen and expulsions are "trending downward," crediting the district's alternative-education placements for some of that improvement.

The presenter said the district provided principals with administrator-level data to check whether disciplinary responses matched the district handbook, aiming to avoid unnecessary in-school suspensions and to favor guardian conferences for lower-level offenses. Smith also reported that 99% of scholars had zero Level 4 offenses last year.

Board members asked clarifying questions about the scope (the presenter confirmed the statistics are district-wide, K'12) and about whether the alma mater and other agenda items would be discussed in public comment. The board did not take any formal action based on the discipline presentation; it was provided for information and to guide administrative focus for the year ahead.