Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Easley council advances UDO first reading after tense debate and two amendments
Summary
After public remarks and a divided council, members moved the first reading to repeal Easley’s zoning code and adopt a Unified Development Ordinance (UDO); the meeting included a failed motion to table, two adopted amendments (one reducing density ~10%, one altering convenience-store produce rules), and a final first-reading vote.
The City of Easley City Council on first reading moved to repeal the city’s existing zoning ordinance and adopt a new Unified Development Ordinance, following a lengthy debate over density and private‑business rules.
Supporters and critics framed the night as a choice between finishing an 18‑month drafting process and preserving neighborhood character. Councilwoman Davidson argued for a tabled postponement to allow more vetting; Councilman Justin (last name not stated on the record) and others pressed for finishing the process, saying the document can be amended later.
Councilmember Justin introduced Amendment 1, described as a roughly 10% reduction in density that modifies figures on page 199 of the UDO. The amendment was seconded and adopted following a recorded voice/hand vote. A second amendment targeting the UDO’s convenience‑store definition (removing a requirement that convenience stores dedicate 500 square feet to fresh produce) was also moved, seconded and adopted after council discussion.
Opponents said the UDO was presented in an incomplete form and argued it should not be voted on before council members had reviewed final language; proponents said the UDO reflects months of public meetings and can be adjusted after adoption. Multiple residents and members of the planning commission urged lower densities and suggested additional workshops; others said earlier zoning changes already reduced densities in 2023.
The council rejected a motion to table the ordinance (the chair recorded more opposing hands than supporting hands during that vote) and returned to the main motion. After debate and disposition of the amendments, the chair called the question for first reading. The transcript records the vote call but does not provide a detailed roll‑call tally in every instance; the motion to proceed on first reading was moved and put to a vote during the meeting.
Why it matters: The UDO replaces Easley’s prior zoning and land‑development rules and will set future density and use standards citywide. Changes to density and commercial‑use rules could affect future housing projects, traffic, and municipal infrastructure needs.
Council next steps: The ordinance was advanced on first reading; additional readings, final votes and potential further amendments remain before the UDO takes effect.
Quote pullouts: "I make a motion to table the UDO until we have a discussion with all the council members," Councilwoman Davidson said, arguing for more time. "This is about a 10% density reduction," Councilmember Justin said when introducing Amendment 1.
Sources: Transcript of City of Easley City Council meeting (public comments and agenda items).
