Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction And Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bath County board approves $16,500 middle‑school site survey, tables two high‑school roof change orders
Summary
The Bath County Board of Education approved a $16,500 site survey for the middle‑school renovation (BG‑25‑048) and voted to table two proposed high‑school roof change orders — a new masonry repair estimated at about $14,005.69 and a kitchen roof repair estimate of about $76,002.77 — for further pricing.
Get email alerts on the Construction And Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Bath County Board of Education on June 23 approved awarding site‑surveying services to QK4 for $16,500 for the Bath County Middle School renovation (BG‑25‑048) and delayed action on two roof change‑order proposals for the high‑school HVAC renovation project (BG‑22‑376).
Board members heard a construction update in a working session before the regular meeting in which a presenter said the LAVEC/high‑school project was "about 95% complete," with gym painting and epoxy work nearing finish and final HVAC and electrical inspections pending before occupancy certification. The presenter told the board the remaining items are minor finishes and inspections and that the district is pressing for a timely final inspection.
Staff also reviewed two pending change orders for the high school. PR 37, a newly proposed masonry repair to plug failing mortar joints and recaulk an expansion joint on the gym backside, was described by staff as work that would cost about $14,005.69. PR 34, a separate proposal addressing a longstanding kitchen‑roof leak and additional roofing replacement, was priced in the backup material at about $76,002.77. Staff recommended tabling both items to negotiate better pricing.
In regular session the board approved the site survey after discussing earlier BG‑1 cost estimates. Staff said the district had expected much higher survey costs but received three quotes with the recommended low bid coming in around $16,005, which staff described as a cost savings that will reduce the middle‑school project total. Carla moved to approve the survey contract and Barbara seconded; the motion carried.
The board subsequently voted to table formal action on PR 34 and PR 37 to allow staff time to negotiate more favorable pricing. Barbara moved to table each change order; Carla seconded both motions and they carried.
The board was told that closing out BG4 and BG5 documents for the high school will be necessary before layback funds can be shifted and final change orders paid; staff estimated that formal closeout and BG revisions would likely occur in August after final payouts and required documentation are collected.
The board will revisit the tabling items when staff returns with updated pricing and documentation.

