Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Library Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Blount County board amends library policy after months of public comment, removes signature accountability language
Summary
After extensive public comment and board debate, Blount County Schools removed an added accountability/signature requirement from proposed library materials policy 4.403, citing concerns that it duplicates existing contract obligations and is prompting teachers to remove classroom libraries.
Get email alerts on the Library Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Blount County Board of Education on a unanimous roll call moved to remove newly proposed accountability language from Policy 4.403 governing library materials, ending weeks of public concern that the change would place an undue legal burden on teachers and prompt classroom librarians to pull their book collections.
Director Tief Teller and members of the policy advisory committee described the package as an attempt to clarify definitions — including "obscenity" and "excessive violence" — and to create clearer procedures for reviewing challenged materials. Teller said the committee reviewed other districts' approaches and material from the Tennessee School Association (as cited in the advisory materials) and that the intent was "to help our teachers and our librarians understand what is acceptable and what isn't," not to punish staff.
Several public speakers, including Jennifer Walker, school library media specialist at Rockford Elementary (District 6), and Dustin Park (District 5) urged the board to remove the accountability paragraph. Walker said the new clause duplicates existing contractual duties and noted "in my building alone, 2 teachers have already removed their classroom libraries" because of uncertainty about the policy's requirements. Park told the board the proposed text "places an inappropriate legal burden on teachers due to vague and broad language" and urged support for librarians.
Board members debated the draft at length, focusing on two issues: whether the signature/accountability block is legally redundant given annual employment contracts requiring adherence to board policy and state law, and whether including a "to the best of my knowledge" certification would have unintended consequences while many classroom catalogs remain incomplete. One board member said the phrase had previously read as a stronger "certify," which drew opposition; the language was revised during committee draft to read "to the best of my knowledge."
After discussion, a motion to strike lines 35–37 — the added accountability/signature language — was made and seconded. The board conducted a roll-call vote; recorded "Yes" votes included Phil Porter, Randy Early Howard, Bridal King, Joe Lindsay, John Lowe, Erica Moore and Chris Pass. The chair announced the motion carried and the lines were removed from the draft.
The board did not complete final adoption of the whole policy revision at the meeting; the amendment changes the draft that will proceed through the board's remaining policy adoption steps. Members said the committee's expanded definitions and a clarified appeal process remain valuable, and several indicated support for additional procedural guidance that would allow principals and staff to document reviews without imposing punitive measures.
Next steps: the policy as amended will return to the board packet for final consideration and formal adoption at a future meeting, with committee members and staff expected to refine implementation procedures and public-facing documentation.

