Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Representation Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Monroe County board adopts policy allowing, but not requiring, student representatives after emergency vote
Summary
After debating whether to treat the measure as an emergency, the Monroe County Board of Education voted to adopt a state-mandated policy that allows school boards to appoint student representatives or create advisory student committees; the policy does not require appointment, board members said.
The Monroe County Board of Education voted to adopt a state-recommended policy allowing student representation after first approving an emergency motion to consider and vote on the measure in a single meeting.
Board leaders said the change responds to a Tennessee law requiring school systems to have a policy in place by July 1 that provides for student representation from each high school. The chair told the board, "we have to have this policy in place by July 1," and presented the Tennessee School Boards Association's recommended language for adoption.
Members debated whether adopting the policy obligates the board to appoint a student to the board. "We have to put it in place, but it doesn't mean that we have to add a student school board member," the chair said. Dean Williams, who moved to approve the policy wording described as allowing the board to "or cannot appoint a student board member," voiced concern about placing a student on the board, saying, "I don't think a kid has any place on the school board." Other board members countered that the policy merely authorizes participation if the board chooses to appoint a representative.
The board first voted to treat the item as an emergency so it could be considered and voted on in one meeting. The roll-call on that motion produced a majority of 'yes' votes and one 'no' vote from Dean Williams. After discussion on the language and two clarifying readings of the motion, the board conducted a roll-call on adoption of the policy and approved it.
The chair and the board's attorney explained the action satisfies the state's deadline while leaving the decision about whether to appoint student representatives to future board discretion. The board directed that the policy be entered into the record; further procedural details and any mechanisms for rotating or advisory student participation were left to the board's follow-up work and policy committee.
The board returned to other agenda items after adopting the policy.
