Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Legislation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Guam EPA reports to board on testimony for local waste bills, plastic bag ban and fee schedule review

Guam EPA Board of Directors · March 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Acting deputy Glenn Snickis told the board Guam EPA submitted testimony supporting a draft universal-waste/solid-waste bill and described the extension and implementation approach for a plastic bag ban (Public Law 36-98). The board asked for earlier notice on fast-moving bills and asked staff to study permit fee schedules.

Guam EPA staff briefed the board on recent legislative activity at the March 20 meeting, including agency testimony on a draft universal-waste/solid-waste bill and ongoing work related to the island’s paper bag ban.

Glenn Snickis said he submitted agency testimony in support of a version of a bill described as "bill 30-38," which would add new code sections to Guam law to establish an islandwide collection plan under the Guam Solid Waste Authority. He told the board the draft adds exemptions and mechanisms intended to help low-income participation and to identify funding options.

Separately, Snickis described Public Law 36-98 (a paper carryout bag ban) and said a phase-out of paper carryout bags is effective July 1, 2025. He explained a discussion with a senator about luxury-brand bags and said Guam EPA's position is that branded luxury bags used exclusively as product packaging are functionally equivalent to standard reusable supermarket bags and could be treated differently than general carryout bags.

Board members requested earlier notification when rapid legislative changes arise. The board also discussed permit fees and fee schedules: members asked staff to evaluate if current inspection and permit services should be charged and to return with options, noting any fee changes would require a public hearing and could take significant time.

The board packet included testimony on Bill 57-38 as well; members noted that some items had moved quickly in the new legislature and asked agency staff to highlight fast-moving matters in future reports.