Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cybersecurity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cheshire County weighs switch to .gov domain amid competing cyber‑security views
Summary
A state‑backed program to move municipal websites and email to .gov was presented to the commissioners; the vendor argues .gov reduces impersonation risks while county IT staff cautioned it does not prevent account compromise and warned of potential false‑security assumptions.
Get email alerts on the Cybersecurity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jason, who described the program as funded and coordinated by the Overwatch Foundation and the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, briefed the board on a statewide effort to move eligible municipal entities to .gov domains to reduce impersonation‑style attacks.
He told the commissioners the program registers .gov names, helps plan phased cutovers, and can reimburse costs such as reprinting business cards or letterhead. “The .gov program does a few things,” Jason said, adding that the program removes the avenue for criminals to register look‑alike .gov addresses and that the statewide grant aims to make the transition cost‑neutral for municipalities.
County IT staff pushed back with cautionary examples, saying a .gov address does not make an account invulnerable and that compromised .gov accounts have been used to spread malware in other jurisdictions. An IT speaker cited incidents where messages from legitimate .gov domains still carried malware, and warned the board against assuming a .gov address alone eliminates phishing risks.
Jason and IT staff agreed on practical next steps: conducting a discovery phase that inventories existing domains, planning redirects so old addresses continue to work, and producing a report before the county commits. Several commissioners said the only immediate urgency they heard was a limited grant window; a number of them said the county should at least reserve or “park” an appropriate .gov name to prevent others from taking it.
Commissioners asked staff to run a few candidate names for availability, to request a discovery report from the foundation if the county wishes to proceed, and to return with a recommendation on whether to undertake a full conversion. IT staff emphasized that migration is primarily a time‑and‑coordination cost rather than a major new technology cost for the county.

