Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves curriculum amendments and Community Cares pilot, votes 4–2 on chief‑of‑police job description
Summary
At its May meeting Methacton’s board approved a $20,000‑capped Community Cares pilot and a package of curriculum items (6–0), carried a motion authorizing diploma signatures, recorded a 4–2 vote against approving a chief‑of‑police job description, and heard public comments on bullying and fiscal transparency.
The Methacton School District board took several formal actions at its May meeting, approving curriculum items (including an amended Community Cares pilot), completing ceremonial diploma signings, and recording a contentious vote on a chief‑of‑police job description.
Early in the meeting the board moved and approved a procedural motion authorizing school directors who have a child graduating in the Class of 2025 (Ms. Purdue and Ms. Grama) to sign diplomas in place of the president; the board carried that motion and the administration conducted several ceremonial diploma signings.
On curriculum items, the board debated a proposed Community Cares pilot program developed with Representative Webster’s office and Mission Kids. Board members questioned whether the program imposed any district costs, how supplemental‑contract advisors would be compensated, and whether the budget should include a cap. Miss Graff moved to amend the curriculum motion to authorize implementation of the Community Cares pilot for the 2025–26 school year "at a cost of up to $20,000." The board approved the amendment 6–0 and then approved the curriculum package, as amended, 6–0.
Separately, the board voted on item 10c — the job description for a chief of police — after discussion. That motion was defeated in a recorded vote (the record shows a 4–2 result against the proposal).
During the public comment period, speakers raised concerns about district fiscal transparency (including a question about funds spent on Apex Awards and Right‑to‑Know reporting), and a parent described ongoing racism and bullying at Skyview and urged the board and administration for stronger follow‑up. Board members acknowledged the comments and outlined that follow‑up reporting and committee work will be brought forward to address concerns about school climate and program implementation.
The meeting adjourned following routine reports and additional committee scheduling.
