Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Consent Orders topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

State Ethics Commission approves multiple consent orders for late filings and disclosure errors

State Ethics Commission · June 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners approved a slate of consent orders resolving reporting and disclosure violations by several candidates and officeholders, with penalties ranging from $125 to $5,000 and one high‑profile matter pulled for rewording and separate consideration.

At its June 12 meeting, the State Ethics Commission approved a package of consent orders resolving a series of late‑filing and disclosure violations by candidates and current officeholders across the state.

Staff summarized each consent agreement before a single motion to approve the slate (with two items held out). Agreed penalties in the batch included a $125 late fee for Clarence Glenn Cook over insufficient detail in expenditures, a $250 fine for Carlotta Harold for missed reports, and larger settlements in other matters. Natalie Hall agreed to $5,000 in combined late fees and civil penalties for multiple failures to file financial disclosures and CCDRs. Chelsea Thompson, a registered lobbyist, agreed to a combined $825 penalty for missed lobbyist disclosure dates under the lobbyist code's fee structure.

One consent order for state senator Derek Mallow was pulled for separate consideration; commissioners asked staff to remove a sentence that implied the commission’s website misled the respondent and to re‑negotiate and re‑execute the agreement without that language. The commission approved the remainder of the consent orders by voice vote.

Commissioners discussed consistency of penalties and directed staff to include more factual detail in consent orders so future commissioners and the public can see why one case warranted a smaller fine and another a larger penalty. Staff acknowledged prior attorneys’ practices varied and committed the new legal team to standardize consent order explanations going forward.

The consent orders address a set of common enforcement themes: missed campaign contribution disclosure reports tied to a special election cycle, late personal financial disclosures, and failures to terminate stale campaign accounts. Where respondents cooperated and provided requested records, staff said it factored into penalty negotiations.

By approving the slate, the commission closed the listed matters that had signed consent agreements while keeping open matters that were pulled for further work.