Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
National Academies outlines clinical guidance review for Red Hill exposures; will not assign liability
Summary
The National Academies study team said it will review scientific evidence and community input to recommend clinical follow‑up for people exposed to the Nov. 2021 JP‑5 release at Red Hill, but it will not assign fault, conduct new toxicology experiments, or recommend remediation or who should pay for care.
The National Academies has framed a focused, evidence‑review project to recommend clinical follow‑up for people exposed during the November 2021 JP‑5 release at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, the committee’s study director said.
"We're a nongovernmental organization that advises the nation on issues related to science, engineering, and medicine," Liz Boyle, senior program officer and study director, told the Fuel Tank Advisory Committee. She said the committee will weigh the strength of the scientific evidence, review existing…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
