Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Waterloo Bridge topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Monroe council debates letter of support for county's proposed Waterloo Park pedestrian bridge
Summary
At a May work session, council members weighed whether to provide a nonbinding letter backing a county SEMCOG planning grant to study a pedestrian bridge from Waterloo Park to the city's north shore, citing a May 23 application deadline and concerns about future commitments and interjurisdictional coordination.
Dionus Slover opened public comment with a vision for a pedestrian bridge across the River Raisin and urged the Monroe City Council to back a county planning grant application.
"I have a dream and I have a vision that a steel bridge will be built across the River Raisin," Slover said, asking the council to support the county's SEMCOG planning-grant application.
Manager Andrew Robinson told the council the item (agenda 52-62) was a county request for a letter of support for a SEMCOG planning grant to produce an engineering plan for a bridge connecting Waterloo Park to the city's north shore. Robinson said the county initiated the request on short notice and that letters of support were due May 23.
Council members expressed a mix of support for the idea and concern about practical implications. Several members, including the mayor, said a letter of support for a planning grant does not on its face create an immediate financial obligation but can be interpreted as a willingness to partner later.
"I guess it wouldn't" financially obligate the city, one councilmember said, while noting a support letter could be read as an intent to partner in the future.
Council discussion focused on three practical issues: (1) Waterloo Park is seasonally open (April 1–Oct. 31), (2) sidewalk and trail connectivity on the north side and across M-50 are limited, and (3) partners and responsibilities (city, county, Monroe Charter Township, MDOT) had not had the level of pre-application coordination some members expected. Deputy director Matt Vanesacker and other staff noted the bridge concept is not currently in the city's adopted parks-and-trails priorities and advised that a planning grant would primarily produce an engineering design and cost estimates.
Several councilmembers said they wanted more interjurisdictional discussion before committing to long-term participation, but Councilmember Andrew — a professional grant writer — urged that a letter of support for a planning study is not the same as a financial commitment. "Any letter of support which is just 'yep we're in support of this project' is not necessarily followed up by any formal partnership or obligation," he said.
By the end of the work session, the mayor invited council members to tell the city manager whether they individually supported submitting a letter of support. A number of members signaled they would support the letter but asked staff to seek follow-up information and agreement from partner jurisdictions before any future commitment.
What happens next: the county may submit the SEMCOG planning-grant application with or without additional municipal letters of support. If the county receives a planning grant, the resulting engineering plan and cost estimate will be the basis for later decisions by council about whether and how to participate in project funding or changes to the city's capital plan.
