Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transit Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Valley Regional Transit asks Garden City for $33,000, pitches longer-term funding agreement
Summary
Valley Regional Transit CEO Elaine Clegg told the Garden City Council that recent service changes produced thousands of new rides in the city and asked the council to include a $33,000 service assessment in its budget or consider a multi-year MOU to stabilize funding.
Valley Regional Transit CEO Elaine Clegg told the Garden City Council on July 14 that recent service changes delivered thousands of new rides in Garden City and said the agency is asking the city to include $33,000 in its budget to sustain added service or to negotiate a longer-term memorandum of understanding so funding is more predictable.
Clegg said Garden City saw "3,120 new rides in Garden City as a result of the service change, 70.7% increase," and highlighted new and expanded routes — including a new Route 20 and half-hour service on Route 21 — as the driver of increased boardings. She described capital projects and State Street/Chinden drainage work that will improve pedestrian access to stops and said VRT is working with county and developers to coordinate new stops near the fairgrounds.
The chief elements of Clegg's pitch were that a fixed-service assessment or an MOU would: provide a baseline for budgeting, smooth capital costs that are otherwise "lumpy," and require public hearings before any council reduces service funding. She described two MOU models used elsewhere: a percentage-of-budget model used with Boise and a per-capita model discussed with Meridian.
Council members questioned operational details: Council member Page asked whether the agency's Lyft/Lift-style program would deliver riders to nearby bus stops and whether VRT could provide service to large local employers such as Micron. Clegg said the lift program provides rides "to or from a transit stop" and that VRT is planning to work on service to Micron, noting the rail alignment would likely stop at Eisenman and Gowan with connections to Micron.
Clegg also discussed fares and governance, saying roughly half of VRT's funding is federal in some years and that operational funding mixes vary between federal and local sources. She told the council VRT is seeing capacity pressure on demand-response services (Beyond Access) and is considering ways to commingle paratransit and fixed-route services without asking for immediate extra funds.
The presentation concluded without a council vote; Clegg asked city staff and council to consider the $33,000 request as they develop the budget and offered to return with examples of MOU language and additional outreach materials.
Next step: Council members said they would consider VRT's request during the budget process and follow up during future meetings.
