Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Judiciary Staffing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Speaker questions whether there are three full‑time sitting judges or three senior judges

Unidentified body · August 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An unidentified speaker raised questions about whether there are "3 full time sitting judges" or instead "3 full time senior judges," and named Karp and Judge Bass; the brief transcript contains no formal action or vote.

An unidentified speaker in a meeting questioned whether there are "3 full time sitting judges, or not," and later said "sitting judges, but 3 full time senior judges," before listing the names "Karp, Judge Bass." The remarks were brief and the transcript shows no motion, vote or formal determination.

The speaker did not provide further context about which court or jurisdiction was being discussed, nor did the transcript attribute any of the lines to Karp or Judge Bass themselves. No legal authorities, budgets, or implementation steps were stated in the available segments. The exchange consists of short, fragmented lines that raise a personnel/structure question but do not record any decision.

Because the excerpt is limited to three short segments, no outcome, directive to staff, or formal action was recorded in the transcript. Additional context would be required to confirm which court or body the remarks referenced and whether any formal staffing or organizational change was under consideration.