Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Meeting participants say adjacent development will mirror Joshua Meadows layout; HOA, lot sizes and stormwater explained
Summary
At an unspecified public meeting, speakers discussed plans to extend a Joshua Meadows–style neighborhood onto adjacent land, saying lots and fencing would be similar, Sandlin is the likely builder, annexation to the existing HOA is desired but not guaranteed, and stormwater will tie into existing culverts and an east-side creek.
Speakers at an unspecified public meeting discussed plans to develop land adjacent to Joshua Meadows into a neighborhood that would mirror the existing community’s open-concept design and lot patterns. Speaker 2 (Unidentified Speaker) said the intent is to ‘extend this more of what Joshua Meadows is,’ while Speaker 3 (Unidentified Speaker) asked specifically whether the project would include the same lack of privacy wood fences and instead use rod-iron or PVC-style treatments.
The discussion centered on three practical points: lot dimensions and housing similarity, homeowners association arrangements, and stormwater drainage. Speaker 2 said Joshua Meadows lots are about two-thirds of an acre in that development and that the new lots would vary in width—roughly 90 feet on the smaller end, about 100 feet for many lots, and up to about 125 feet on larger lots. "The idea is to just extend this more of what Joshua Meadows is," Speaker 2 said, adding that Sandlin is "the most likely builder in this anyway."
On governance, Speaker 2 said the preference would be to have the existing Joshua Meadows HOA annex the new area but that annexation would require that HOA board’s approval; if annexation did not occur, the new area could form a separate HOA. Speaker 2 said they had pursued the concept for about two years and had discussed timing and roadway control with local contacts, including a recent meeting with someone named Scott to explore concurrent development of adjacent parcels.
Stormwater and drainage were raised as a separate issue. Speaker 3 asked where the detention pond or stormwater facilities would be located. Speaker 2 described a low area and existing detention on the west side of Quail Hollow, noting there will be a box culvert under Quail Hollow that ties into the county road culvert. Speaker 2 also said that most runoff from the specific property being discussed flows east to a creek on the east side and not into the same drainage basin as the Quail Hollow detention area.
No formal motions, votes or binding decisions were recorded during the exchange. Speaker 2 described construction pacing on nearby phase 3C, saying Sandlin is currently building and selling "about a home a month." The meeting closed with Speaker 1 asking for final questions and adjourning when none were raised.
Note on sources and speaker labels: The transcript identifies participants only by speaker number (Speaker 1, Speaker 2, Speaker 3). This article retains those numeric labels and attributes quotes and claims only to the transcript’s labeled speakers.
