Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Shelton holds public hearing on amendment to Ordinance No. 104 for Economic Development Commission

Shelton City (unspecified governing body) · August 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Shelton held a public hearing Aug. 26, 2025 on a proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 104 that would clarify language referring to the Economic Development Commission. Corporation counsel recommended inserting the word "corporation" after "commission." No members of the public spoke and the hearing was closed.

Shelton held a public hearing Tuesday on a proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 104, which establishes the city’s Economic Development Commission, to clarify language in the ordinance. Corporation counsel recommended inserting the word "corporation" after the word "commission" to avoid confusion.

The hearing notice, the moderator said, appeared in the Bridgeport Post on Aug. 20, 2025. The moderator also read the ordinance language aloud and noted the ordinance establishes a five-member Economic Development Commission appointed by the mayor, with initial staggered terms of one through five years and subsequent five-year terms. The speaker referenced statutory authority for the commission in the Connecticut General Statutes (cited orally during the hearing).

The moderator opened the floor for public testimony and asked three times whether anyone wished to comment, saying the comment period was open to any speaker. No members of the public responded. With no testimony, a motion was made and seconded to close the public hearing and adjourn the meeting; the moderator announced the public hearing was closed and the meeting adjourned at 7:11 p.m.

The amendment discussed is a technical clarification of phrasing and naming in the ordinance text; the hearing record contains no public opposition or support. The record does not show a recorded roll-call vote on the motion to close the hearing and adjourn.