Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Assessment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Superintendent presents largely positive assessment results; district flags testing nuances

BYRAM HILLS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Board of Education · September 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Superintendent Tim presented the district's annual assessment report, showing strong proficiency rates in ELA and math across most grades, cohort gains after COVID disruptions, and cautions about small subgroup sample sizes and state test renorming affecting some regents and science results.

Superintendent Tim presented the Byram Hills Central School District's annual assessment report, summarizing state assessment results for the prior school year and explaining why some figures remain unofficial until state verification in November. He said proficiency (levels 3 and 4) rose in most elementary and middle grades, with eighth-grade ELA proficiency near 91 percent.

Tim said cohort analysis — tracking the same students over time — shows steady gains after the COVID-related testing gap in 2020–21. "This is why the cohort data is really important to look at," he said, adding that some cohorts made "the biggest jump" once regular testing resumed. He cautioned that year-to-year comparisons can be misleading for groups that did not take tests during the pandemic.

The superintendent noted the district is about "30 above where the state is" in elementary and middle school accountability measures, and he highlighted sustained math outcomes tied to a long-standing district math curriculum. On math, Tim said many grades posted proficiency rates in the nineties and described algebra pathways and cohort improvements.

Tim also raised caveats for small subgroups such as students with disabilities: because subgroup sizes can be small, a change affecting a few students can shift a percentage point substantially. "I put the n for the last year because it's important to note these are low numbers," he said, illustrating how three students could change a subgroup percentage by about 10 points.

The board and Tim discussed recently revised state assessments, including new science standards and re-normed regents exams. Tim said first-year administrations of new tests often underperform and that the district will not count a new regents exam in a student's final course average unless it helps the student. "We're not gonna let a state changing its norming hurt our kids," he said.

Tim said the district would follow up with the state to resolve accountability nuances created by acceleration (e.g., accelerated eighth graders taking algebra) and federal high-school accountability rules. He described short-term options the district could pursue, such as double-testing accelerated students in eighth grade or seeking state permission to count AP or other exams toward the required measures.

The report also covered AP outcomes and other measures: 794 AP exams were taken by 369 students, with a generally consistent share scoring 3 or higher since 2018. Tim said the district will publish the full state-verified report card when it becomes official.

The board did not take any formal policy vote tied directly to the report at the meeting; Tim outlined follow-up steps, including sharing updated slides and pursuing state guidance on accountability questions.