Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears North Smithfield Food Pantry decline and debates bond authorization and fundraising next steps
Summary
The committee learned the North Smithfield Food Pantry will not participate in the project now; a committee member urged Council to commit to a $6 million bond authorization rather than reducing the project to $4 million, while the facilitator said the committee needs the updated cost estimate before making cuts or firm requests.
The Howell Multigenerational Building Committee was told by Speaker 1 on July 17 that Darlene McGaw informed the committee the North Smithfield Food Pantry "has decided not to move forward with us" for the project; Speaker 1 said the door remains open for phases 2 and 3 collaboration.
Why it matters: The loss of a community partner changes programming assumptions and may affect fundraising and space assignments. Committee members immediately turned to next steps for funding and Council direction.
A committee member (Speaker 3) urged the committee to press the council for clarity about its funding commitment, arguing the group should request authorization sufficient to build the fuller $6 million project rather than accept a reduced $4 million footprint. "We know we're talking about the elusive $2,000,000 ... would it be wise for this committee ... to say to the council categorically, will you even consider a bond to make up the difference so that we can go with the $6,000,000 or the $4?" the member said, emphasizing the value of authorization even if the town does not immediately draw on the bond.
Speaker 3 also recommended quantifying a $1 million offset that could be assigned to separate basketball/pickleball facilities so those dollars could be parked as an expected credit to the building budget and reduce pressure on the core project budget.
Speaker 1 replied that no parts of the project should be 'chopped away' until the committee receives the updated cost estimate from BH+A. The facilitator said other cost items — including furniture packages Linda has been working on and potential donations — will affect the final project cost and should be clarified before the committee asks Council to authorize bonds or cuts. Speaker 1 said the administration (Mark) will be asked for clarity on grant and budget items and the group will present the committee’s outstanding recommendations at Monday's council meeting.
Quote: "I don't know why it should be because I've been speaking of this ... and that is we know we're talking about the elusive $2,000,000 ... would it be wise for this committee ... to say to the council categorically, will you even consider a bond to make up the difference so that we can go with the $6,000,000..." (Committee member, Speaker 3).
Next steps: The committee will present outstanding recommendations to the council at the upcoming Monday meeting, seek administration clarification about which funds can be applied or reallocated, and wait for BH+A's updated cost estimate before endorsing scope reductions or a formal bond request.
The meeting recorded no formal vote on a bond or funding option; the committee approved the July 1 minutes earlier in the meeting and then adjourned by voice vote.
