Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Senate Bill 80 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers pause consideration of Senate Bill 80 after House amendment allowing KC teams to move to Clay County
Summary
Missouri legislators discussed Senate Bill 80 and a House amendment that would let the Kansas City Royals and Kansas City Chiefs relocate to Clay County; the bill was set aside for further consideration as the session nears adjournment.
Get email alerts on the Senate Bill 80 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Missouri senators on the Senate floor took up discussion of Senate Bill 80, which the Missouri House recently amended to allow the Kansas City Royals and the Kansas City Chiefs to relocate to Clay County.
The transcript identifies Senator Curtis Gregory of Marshall as the sponsor of Senate Bill 80. An unidentified speaker raised the question that framed the debate: “What is the state of Missouri going to do to try and keep the Chiefs and the Royals inside of the state of Missouri?” The speaker also said an earlier provision tied to the bill involved the Clay County Sports Authority and called that provision “just a small piece of the puzzle.”
Senator Barbara Ann Washington of Kansas City highlighted the local stakes in the discussion, noting that “Both of these Kansas City area stadiums sit in and have always sat in my community” and referenced the Truman Sports Complex as part of the city’s sports history. The remarks emphasized that the stadiums and teams are long-standing institutions in her district.
The transcript records that Senate Bill 80 was “set aside for further consideration” on the floor; the record does not include text of a formal vote, the specific amendment language, or any tally of votes. The discussion in the transcript also includes an item noting that the legislative session will end on Friday, a scheduling detail that may affect the bill’s timeline.
The transcript does not include details on the amendment’s language, any fiscal analyses, whether local governments or teams support the relocation language, or any formal motions to adopt or reject the amendment. Those details were not specified in the provided record.
Reporting from the state capital, Dean Morgan closed the segment by noting the status of the bill and the session timeline.

