Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Consent Orders topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Georgia ethics panel adopts wide slate of consent orders resolving campaign‑finance and disclosure violations

State Ethics Commission (Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission) · September 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The State Ethics Commission adopted a large set of consent orders on Sept. 17, resolving dozens of campaign‑finance and disclosure cases with penalties ranging from late‑filing fees to multi‑thousand‑dollar civil fines. Staff emphasized cooperation and corrective filings in many matters.

The State Ethics Commission adopted a broad package of consent orders at its Sept. 17 meeting, resolving numerous campaign‑finance and disclosure complaints dating from recent election cycles. Staff walked commissioners through each case and the agreed penalties, and the commission approved the package by voice vote.

Staff detailed a range of cases: Charles Bourgeois, an Atlanta City Council candidate, agreed to a $500 civil penalty after staff said the campaign mistakenly filed a statewide declaration rather than the municipal DOI; “it was simply an error,” staff said, and records showed no intent to circumvent the law. A county ballot‑question committee tied to a Macon SPLOST referendum received approximately $50,000 routed through the Macon Industrial Authority and agreed to a $1,500 penalty after staff concluded private donors — not taxpayer funds — were used. A cluster of small‑dollar campaigns faced relatively modest penalties after incomplete recordkeeping; Chad Jones Smith’s matter, for example, resulted in $525 in combined late fees and penalties for issues tied to PayPal records.

Other notable matters included a $5,000 agreed penalty in the Lester Miller case, where staff said $220,000 moved from a campaign committee to a nonprofit with connections to the candidate before funds reached an independent committee; staff and commissioners debated whether the statute’s reference to a “controlling interest” required majority ownership or could be satisfied at lower ownership percentages. The commission also approved a $5,000 total penalty against the Georgia Freedom Fund for failing to properly register and report hybrid independent‑expenditure activity tied to roughly $50,000 in spending.

Commissioners repeatedly emphasized that consent orders are settlements between parties and not binding precedent. After staff presentations the chair moved to adopt the consent orders as presented (with two matters held briefly for minor factual edits); the commission approved the package by voice vote and later adopted the two held orders after the edits were made.

The commission recorded a pattern in which many respondents cooperated, amended reports, and paid assessed penalties; staff said corrective action and cooperation were key factors in resolving the matters without contested hearings.

The commission’s action concluded the public presentations on consent orders; it moved on to rulemaking and advisory items on the agenda.