Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Cassidy School topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council reviews Cassidy School's Kirby Family Hall plans and PUD compliance

Village City Council · February 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council heard Cassidy Schools' concept and design review for a new Kirby Family Hall on the Camp Cassidy campus, including a reported 35,056 sq. ft. building coverage and ongoing city-engineer review of detention; Planning & Zoning recommended approval, and council members asked about parking, gates and setbacks.

The Village City Council received a presentation on a zoning and building-design review filed by Cassidy Schools for the proposed Kirby Family Hall on the Camp Cassidy campus.

A Cassidy Schools representative presented the concept and told the council the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval of the submitted plans. The presenter said the development would include a building with total coverage of 35,056 square feet and described program spaces such as offices, conference and meeting rooms, kitchen facilities and storage.

The presenter referenced the Cassidy Schools PUD and related architectural regulations established in a council resolution (the presentation cited the establishing document as "resolution 8 3 20 20 b") and said the project is being designed to meet those PUD standards, including screening, setbacks and parking. The presenter also said detention design is under review by the city engineer and that, to date, no issues were identified in that review.

During questions, council members and residents raised site-specific concerns including the location of the gate, parking congestion and the demolition of an existing house on the site. The presenter answered that the new access would be east of the existing gate, that demolition has occurred on part of the campus, and that pre-construction meetings with architects and engineers have been conducted.

No formal council vote or final action on the zoning matter is recorded in the transcript excerpt provided to the council during the presentation. The council did not record a motion or documented outcome in the available transcript segment.