Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Graduation Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears plan to phase in higher graduation-credit targets, members press equity concerns
Summary
District staff proposed phasing toward higher graduation-credit expectations over several years to encourage dual enrollment, CTE and work-based learning; board members raised concerns about students with below-average achievement and supports that will be provided.
Get email alerts on the Graduation Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Chester County School Board discussed a district recommendation on Sept. 12 to phase in higher graduation-credit requirements that would move the district back toward a 25-credit expectation over multiple years.
District administrator (Speaker 2) reviewed the scheduling history: during a prior trimester schedule the district had a 25-credit structure; after returning to a 6-period day the district adopted the State Board of Education minimum of 22 credits. Speaker 2 said the request—made by Coach Murley—would target students who need motivation to remain enrolled and to take advantage of dual enrollment, work-based learning and CTE opportunities.
"We want our students, if they have interest, to go through a work based learning...or dual enrollment," Speaker 2 said, adding that the current senior class would remain on a 22-credit requirement and any increase would phase in so students have time to adjust.
Board members asked about the effect on average and below-average students and requested assurances about interventions. Speaker 2 said summer school, intervention supports and acceptance of dual-enrollment coursework (including college classes that substitute for a full-year credit) would be emphasized and that district graduation rates are above 90 percent. Speaker 4 expressed concern that raising requirements could make it harder for some students to finish on time.
The transcript records discussion but does not show a formal motion or vote to change the graduation requirement at this meeting; district staff described timing options and emphasized supports to be provided if the board pursues the policy change.

