Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

TREC presents FY2026 draft budget showing multi-year deficits; plans staffing efficiencies

Texas Real Estate Commission · May 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

CFO Renata Williams presented a draft FY2026 budget that projects a roughly $4.8 million operational deficit for FY26 and recommends not backfilling 9.6 FTEs as part of efficiency measures; the commission will revisit a final adoption in August.

The Texas Real Estate Commission on May 5 reviewed a first-draft FY2026 budget that projects a multi-year operating shortfall driven largely by flat licensing and exam revenues.

CFO Renata Williams told commissioners the agency intends to present a final budget for adoption in August but that the first-draft shows a FY26 beginning balance of about $10.9 million, projected revenue of roughly $14.0 million and expenditures near $18.9 million, yielding an operational deficit of about $4.8 million. Williams said licensing fees account for about 90% of agency revenue and that a recent dip in initial sales-agent applications is suppressing exam and application fees.

To manage costs, staff proposed not backfilling 9.6 vacant full-time equivalent positions — a $488,420 savings — and identified one-time professional-fee needs (including a tentative web development project estimated at $400,000). Williams summarized RAMP (the license-management system) as a multi-year capital project budgeted at $5.6 million with $2.7 million recognized to date and cautioned that implementation-related consulting and production costs are a key variable.

Williams said projected reserves would decline across FY26–FY28 under the current plan, and staff will fine-tune assumptions and consider further efficiencies before the August adoption. Commissioners asked clarifying questions about staffing and assumptions; no fee increases were adopted at the meeting.