Committee advances substitute for Lakewood front‑yard plantings ordinance after public input

The Housing, Planning & Development Committee on Sept. 8 discussed a proposed ordinance (referred to in the meeting as Ordinance 18 20 25) that would expressly allow ‘‘managed natural landscapes’’ in front yards while keeping safety‑based limits for pedestrian and motorist sight lines.

Chair opened by saying the item was for discussion and public input, not a final vote, and described changes he had circulated: trimming some setbacks from 4 feet to 2 feet on side property lines and keeping a 2‑foot setback from driveways so landscaping remains mowable. He said the draft ‘‘would affirmatively allow naturally managed landscapes’’ while relying on existing code sections that permit enforcement when vegetation obstructs walkways or sight lines.

Members and staff repeatedly emphasized that the building department would continue to enforce safety standards. The chair cited existing code language used for enforcement and described a 36‑inch threshold for when plants that obscure motorist or pedestrian sight lines may be cited, while noting that taller plantings could remain if they do not obstruct visibility.

Public commenters urged clearer drafting so ordinary residents understand what is allowed. Allison Welch, of 1656 Orchard Grove, asked whether the 6‑inch standard mentioned in the draft applied only to turf (‘‘the 6 inches is for the turf grama or ground cover’’) and was reassured that the 6‑inch limit applies to turf grass while other ornamental or managed plantings would be treated under separate definitions.

Agnes Michalak of Keep Lakewood Beautiful asked who determines what counts as a ‘‘managed native natural landscape’’ and urged staff and KLB to work together on a clear plant list and guidance. Assistant law director Swallow and other staff said the tree lawn (the area between sidewalk and street) is part of the public right‑of‑way and is regulated differently by public works; staff also said the city can revise its prohibited‑plant list with stakeholder input.

Several councilmembers raised implementation concerns: grandfathering existing long‑established gardens, consistency of enforcement, special treatment for corner lots and main intersections, and the need for public education. Members suggested a phased rollout with figures and clearer language for residents.

Councilman Bullock moved to adopt the chair’s redlined version as a substitute to serve as a new baseline; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. The committee explicitly kept the ordinance in committee to allow staff to update figures and solicit additional input from the building department and community groups.

What’s next: Committee members said they expect further hearings and public outreach before any ordinance would be referred out of committee, including updated drawings and collaboration with Keep Lakewood Beautiful on educational materials.