Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Renewable Energy Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consumers Energy presents 20-year renewable subscription to Jackson council; city staff ask for follow-up detail
Summary
Consumers Energy presented a turnkey renewable-energy subscription program that the utility says could help Jackson meet carbon goals and foresees a 20-year net savings forecast of just over $900,000. Councilors asked for more detail on forecasts and timing; no action was taken.
Consumers Energy representatives described a renewable-energy subscription program to Jackson City Council on June 10, presenting a 20-year contract option that the company says is designed to drive new Michigan-based wind and solar resources while offering participating customers energy and capacity credits.
Ryan Buhinger, senior energy solutions manager at Consumers Energy, told councilors the program is turnkey with no upfront capital or on-site construction required of the city. He said enrollment designates which city accounts and what portion of usage the city would like to match with renewable generation; that enrollment, Consumers said, drives development of new projects and yields energy and capacity credits that may offset subscription fees in later years.
Buhinger cited an illustrative forecast showing a net savings across 20 years of just over $900,000 and said the program start date for enrolled customers would be 2028. He and Carol Lee McKinsey Master explained the difference between "energy" credits (value of energy yielded by the city's share of a project) and "capacity" credits (market value when sold into MISO), and said they use third-party vendors (Argus and IHS) to produce conservative price forecasts.
Councilors raised multiple technical questions: how the subscription cost is computed (kWh subscribed multiplied by a fixed per-kWh subscription rate presented as 0.064), whether the company was using Jackson as a pilot site (Consumers denied that), whether pending utility rate cases affect program forecasts (Consumers said the recent rate request is separate and not included in the program forecast), and whether the program is available to residential customers (Consumers said variations are available at different scales). The presenters offered to follow up with more detailed forecasts and locations of projects in Michigan and to share Argus/IHS assumptions.
No formal council action was requested or taken; staff indicated the presentation was informational and that council could follow up in future meetings.
