Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Greer City Council approves multiple rezoning, annexation and a mobile‑food ordinance on Aug. 26
Summary
Council voted to approve several second‑reading items including a mobile‑food ordinance, an annexation with Traditional Neighborhood zoning and two rezoning requests, and also consented to an assignment of an economic development agreement for a Clarus Group building sale.
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its Aug. 26 meeting, the Greer City Council approved a series of second‑reading items and a resolution. Roll‑call votes recorded affirmative responses from Arrowood, Booker, Hopper, Dumas, Bettis, Albert (or Allen) and Mayor Danner on each item as noted below.
Votes at a glance
- Ordinance 16‑2025 — Amendments to City Code regarding mobile food units (second and final reading): Council approved the ordinance after staff outlined changes since first reading, including reducing a proposed 10‑year provision to five years and consolidating redundant subsections into the Unified Development Ordinance. (Motion to receive and adopt carried by roll call.)
- Ordinance 18‑2025 — Annexation and Traditional Neighborhood zoning for property owned by True North Properties LLC (Cold Brook Drive, 100% petition): Planning commission and staff recommended approval; council adopted the ordinance on second reading.
- Ordinance 19‑2025 — Rezoning for RMM Enterprises LLC (306 East Frontage Road) from Commercial Corridor to Manufacturing Logistics: Planner reported no updates; council approved the second reading.
- Resolution 17‑2025 — Consent to partial assignment of an economic development agreement for a Clarus Group industrial project: City staff explained the assignment to IPCP Acquisition Company for one building in the Clarus development and confirmed the original investment figure ($27,600,000); council approved the resolution.
- Ordinance 15‑2025 and Ordinance 21‑2025 were received and moved forward as presented (rezoning requests with staff recommendation and planning commission review); Ordinance 22‑2025 (UDO amendments) was given a first reading and received for further consideration.
Council did not record any negative votes on the second‑reading items presented that evening. Where staff provided fiscal or project specifics, such as the $27.6 million investment associated with the Clarus development, that number was stated during the presentation.

