Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews feasibility-study vendor and $243,000 price point for district facilities review
Summary
Board discussed a proposed facilities feasibility study (part of long-range planning) with staff saying the recommended vendor reduced price to roughly $243,000 by reusing existing data; board members asked about enrollment projections, tuition/fee impacts and whether the contract should be voted separately instead of on consent.
Get email alerts on the Facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff presented an updated feasibility-study proposal and recommended contracting with a mid-range bidder who used prior enrollment and capacity studies to reduce costs. Staff said the vendor will conduct site visits, build on Cooperative Strategies'enrollment work, and include community input to guide long-range capital decisions such as whether to consolidate central services buildings or make targeted renovations.
The presentation noted earlier estimates near $350,000 and explained how reusing existing reports and narrowing the scope trimmed the price to approximately $243,000. Board members asked for follow-up on how the study will treat out-of-district tuition and fee waivers, whether economics modeling will be added to the scope, and whether changing the scope would increase fees.
Staff answered that the final scope will be negotiated after vendor selection and that board feedback on desired study elements (for example, evaluation of fee waivers or potential enrollment scenarios) will be incorporated into the contract. The board was told capital funds (including district capital and capital commission funds) will be the likely budget source for the work and that additional scope items will raise the fee.
Given the size and importance of the study, the chair suggested the feasibility-study contract not be placed on the consent agenda and instead be voted on as a standalone item next week so the board can discuss scope and expectations before final approval.

